The great teachers of the Church and of the Greek nation, Makarios 
Notaras, Nikodemos of the Holy Mountain and Athanasios of Paros, who 
lived and worked in the 18th and early 19th centuries, form a new 
trinity of shining lights of the Church, like the three Fathers of the 
Church in the past, relatively speaking of course and bearing in mind 
the historical circumstances they lived through with their similarities 
and differences. To these three must be added Neophytos of Kafsokalyvia,
 who started the movement, although he was not as important or active as
 the other three would later become, thus earning their place in the 
Communion of Saints. They were nicknamed Kollyvades by their opponents 
on the Holy Mountain because they objected to the transfer of the 
memorial services (involving kollyva) from Saturday to Sunday in 
defiance of tradition, rightly judging that services for the dead are 
incompatible with the resurrectional and festal nature of Sunday.
This of course was a minor detail within their greater work of 
renewal and enlightenment. It was deliberately stressed and exaggerated 
in order to obscure the importance of their other work, and also to 
denigrate them as being people who concerned themselves with petty 
matters, as memorial services and kollyva supposedly were. Even today 
there are scholars who belittle them and their work, seeing the whole 
through the distorting prism of the memorial service controversy. 
Fortunately in recent decades, during which Greek historical and 
theological research has begun to free itself from Western ties, 
dependency and influence, their work has been reassessed as an 18th 
century philokalian renaissance. This renaissance had a decisive impact 
in strengthening and reinforcing the education of the enslaved Orthodox 
peoples and in preserving their awareness of who they were, not only 
vis-à-vis the Ottoman conquerors but also vis-à-vis the Western 
missionaries who spread out all over the Orthodox world, proselytising 
by unfair means, and especially by exploiting the ignorance, enslavement
 and poverty of the Orthodox faithful.
There was a great danger that the Orthodox would convert either to 
Islam or to a Western form of Christianity. Indeed, the second was the 
greater danger due to the West’s high level of civilisation, which made 
assimilation easier, whereas the feeling of superiority to Islam raised 
some barriers and reservations. There is the classic statement by the 
other great teacher and saint of that period, St Kosmas Aetolos, 
explaining why God allowed the Orthodox to be enslaved by the Turks 
rather than by the Franks [Westerners]: “Three hundred years after 
Christ’s Resurrection, God sent us Saint Constantine and established the
 kingdom for 1150 years. Then God took it away from the Christians, and 
for their own good gave it to the Turk for 320 years. And why did God 
bring the Turk and not some other nation? For our own good, because the 
other nations would have harmed our faith, but the Turk, as long as you 
give him money, will let you do as you like.”
However, after the dark ages of ignorance and illiteracy of the 
previous centuries, the roots of education were needed to raise a 
barrier against conversions to Islam or Western Christianity, to prevent
 a multitude of small streams becoming a river that would sweep away the
 Nation. What St Kosmas Aetolos did by travelling around the country and
 founding schools for the people, the Kollyvades Saints did at a higher 
level by publishing and interpreting texts from Scripture and the 
Fathers, Lives and Services of Saints, hymns, and even grammar, rhetoric
 and philosophy textbooks and also ancient Greek and Western classical 
writers. The aim was to enlighten the Nation and maintain it in its 
faith and in the traditions of the Fathers, to preserve Greek Orthodox 
culture. They wanted to ensure that in the schools, which were appearing
 in increasing numbers, the teachers, monks and priests would be able to
 understand Greek texts through school education, but also to publish 
these texts, since the manuscripts were few and far between, either 
hidden away in monastic libraries or looted by crafty foreign 
travellers.
One can even discern in their truly impressive educational and 
literary efforts a special emphasis on action to meet the danger of 
conversions to Islam or Western Christian denominations. It is well 
known that many Neo-Martyrs had as mentors, who supported them 
psychologically on the road to martyrdom, Kollyvades Saints such as St 
Makarios and St Nikodemos of the Holy Mountain. It is certain that what 
many Neo-Martyrs proclaimed before the Turkish judges regarding the 
superiority of the Christian faith to the religion of Muhammed, which 
they disparage and reject, echoed the teaching of the Kollyvades Saints.
 Many of these exchanges between these Neo-Martyrs and the Turkish 
judges, which recall the martyrologies of old, were preserved by St 
Nikodemos in his “New Martyrology”. The same interpretation must be put 
on the anti-Western works of St Athanasios of Paros; “The Antipope”, 
“The Judgement of Heaven”, “That Palamas” and other works on the 
aberrations and errors of the Latins.
The contribution of the Kollyvades to education and culture was not 
limited to raising the self-awareness of the Orthodox peoples vis-à-vis 
the twin dangers of assimilation by East or West, which were very great.
 It had another, equally broad, dimension, in which they appeared to 
have less success, not because their teachings were without effect, but 
because unfortunately, from 1821 the modern Greek state was violently 
cut off from the Greek Orthodox tradition. It abandoned traditional 
Greek Christian education and, guided by and in tutelage to the West, 
turned against its Byzantine heritage, against the Saints and the Church
 Fathers, against all that was holy for the Nation.
It is known that the Kollyvades Saints, and especially St Athanasios 
of Paros, clashed with the European and Europeanising supporters of the 
Enlightenment in modern Greece, who adopted the ideas of the French 
Enlightenment and the French Revolution, and even the atheism of 
Voltaire, and who attempted to direct the course of modern Greek culture
 towards classical antiquity, extolling and stressing the worldly wisdom
 and knowledge of antiquity while underrating or ignoring divine wisdom.
 Rationalism, science, knowledge and freedom were the new deities in the
 Enlightenment creed. The Byzantine synthesis, in which the healthy 
elements of the ancient Greek spirit were preserved and strengthened and
 pressed into the service of the divine message of love, humility and 
reconciliation that derives from the teaching of the Gospel of the 
Cross, was abandoned and disparaged. It was essentially a new form of 
persecution of the church, similar to the attempts by the Emperor Julian
 the Apostate in the fourth century to revive pure Hellenism in the 
place of Christianity, and by Barlaam the Calabrian in the fourteenth 
century to introduce into Orthodox Byzantium the scholasticism and 
rationalism of the Western Renaissance, rejecting the tried and true 
method of enlightenment and perfection used by the Fathers of the Church
 which emphasised divine wisdom, but without rejecting worldly or human 
wisdom. The three Fathers of the fourth century, Basil the Great, 
Gregory the Theologian and John Chrysostom, with their fine classical 
Greek education, like St Gregory Palamas in the fourteenth century, 
barred the way back to an unwholesome classicism that places the created
 above the uncreated, human wisdom above divine wisdom, as was said by 
the blessed monk Christoforos Papoulakos on observing the wrong course 
taken after 1821 by westernised Greek scholars and clergymen, who 
adopted in their entirety the ideas of the European Enlightenment.
It is worth noting that the revolutionary heroes of 1821, 
Kolokotronis, Makrygiannis, Papaflessas and others, who had been brought
 up in the spirit of tradition, felt betrayed on this point. They had 
struggled to free the Greeks from the Turks in body, and now they saw 
Greece becoming enslaved spiritually, surrendering her soul, to the 
Europeans.
Latinisation returned in the form of Europeanisation and 
Westernisation. The West, which had been unable to “enlighten” free 
Byzantium with Barlaam the Calabrian, that is to plunge the Greeks into 
darkness, because St Gregory Palamas reacted with the Hesychast 
movement, nor again under the Turkish occupation due to the Hesychastic 
movement of the Kollyvades, attempted again after 1821 by placing the 
modern Greek state, education and culture under its spiritual tutelage. 
It seems, however, that it is once again being defeated.
The Kollyvades, reviled even in the name they were given, profoundly 
influenced Orthodox faith and life as true successors of the patristic 
Hesychast tradition. Both the Holy Mountain, which bred them, and St 
Gregory Palamas can be proud of these great teachers of Orthodoxy and 
the Nation.
 
 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment