London, March 19, 2012
“This morning I talked to a woman who was forced to take off her cross at work a week ago. She preferred to resign. And the cross was not even visible! The woman asked to be allowed to wear it, promising to attach it to the body with duct tape to keep it from accidentally slipping from under her clothes, but they said it’s not allowed,”
Archpriest Mikhail Dudko, the cathedral’s sacristan, said on Facebook.
He said the position of the British government, which opposes freedom
to openly wear crosses, is understood by local authorities as “a total
ban” and people with poor knowledge of the language and life in the UK
“have virtually no chance of defending their rights.”
According
to earlier reports, the British authorities intend to defend the
legality of the ban on public wearing of crosses in the UK in the
European Court of Human Rights.
The Strasbourg court will try lawsuits involving the religious
discrimination against four Christians from the UK, who have lost their
cases in British courts.
The Russian Church earlier expressed surprise about the loyalty of
the British authorities, who have banned wearing crosses at work, to
other symbols, for example, gay symbols.
“This decision made by the British parliament is certainly alarming, especially given the existence in modern European society of other tendencies aimed at liberating human instincts,”
Vladimir Legoyda, the head of the Synodal Information Department,
told reporters. He said he was surprised by the fact that public
demonstration of affiliation with gay culture is considered normal in
the UK while the wearing of crosses is not. Among the examples of double
standards Legoyda named the British authorities’ stance on Sikhs,
saying that even London police officers are officially allowed to wear
turbans, which are Sikh symbols.
Among the four cases to be tried in Strasbourg is a claim filed by a
woman who was suspended from her job with British Airways several years
ago for refusing to take off her cross, which she wore on top of her
uniform.
The other claimants are Shirley Chaplin, who had worked as a nurse
for 30 years before being fired for wearing a cross at work, Lillian
Leidel, an official with a London civil registry office, who was
subjected to disciplinary punishment for refusing to register a gay
marriage for religious reasons, and Garry McFarlane, a resident of
Bristol, a former employee of a firm providing confidential
consultations to gay couples, who was fired because he had difficulty
working because of his religious beliefs.
No comments:
Post a Comment